| ||
| Job Evaluation Anger |
|
|
|
| Written by Glen Williams | |
| Thursday, 03 June 2010 | |
|
Thursday 3rd June - Understandable Anger UNISON has received one or two very angry, and unnecessarily personalised attacks from members who are set to lose income through Job Evalution and I thought I should respond to ensure the position is clear: 1/ No agreement with the proposed Pay Model has yet been achieved with any of the unions and the Council. The period we are in at present is one of re-checking for errors in the JE scores or anomalies that our members are highlighting and getting them rectified 2/ All posts have been evaluated - all UNISON Members have been advised (more than 12 times via website, workplace meetings, emails and Newsletter) to contact us to go through your JE submission to ensure the 'worth' of your job is properly evaluated. 3/ UNISON is working extremely hard to reduce, where possible, any losses of income. We are re-checking the scores and the Job Descriptions of all who contact us and submitting additional evidence where scores should be uplifted. 4/ UNISON is very clear that some mistakes may have been made in such an enormous exercise and has already identified simple human errors that have lowered the scores of some posts and are having them checked by the Council. 5/ UNISON will represent all Members who have a legitimate Appeal, once the final letters go out in late June/early July. 6/ The anger felt by the small minority who have been identified as losing income is perfectly understandable and UNISON is prioritising them as requiring most support and advice at present. I would ask for some understanding also of the fact that essentially there are two of us dealing with the hundreds of enquiries we still get about car parking, the budget, compulsory redundancies as well as Job Evaluation before we do any casework. Our immediate priority is to advise and represent those members who are potentially going to lose income as a result of Job Evalaution. Your understanding of this is requested and a recognition that the immediate response some demand will simply not be forthcoming for the next few weeks unless it is about Job Evaluation. 7/ If you have a query about your JE letter simply email or contact the Branch and ask for a single page JE Query Form. Your Branch Officers will use this form to collate groups of collective issues and advice as well as individually advise and represent at Appeal if necessary. 8/ UNISON met yesterday with the Council to further progress 'snags' that we have had pointed out or discovered in relation to the JE scores. I have written formally today to clarify all the points we raised and will keep members informed as appropriate. 9/ On a personal note, I attended the 3 hour meeting yesterday, then spent 4 hours reviewing other JE matters in the Office, followed by 4 hours emailing collegues from home to ensure all areas of JE and UNISON Policy are covered. Today, I have spent 4 hours writing reports for JE and UNISON Conference. I wish no sympathy or recognition for this, simply some understanding of the fact that I am actually ON LEAVE this week and I am not alone in your Branch Office putting members 1st well above and beyond the contracted hours or call of duty. 10/ Please do not forget - all those colleagues in your office, workplace or depot not in UNISON, will not get expert representation or advice on their JE score or at Appeal. This might be a good time to get them to join us, simply ask the question! Glen Williams, Branch Secretary, Sefton UNISON. |
|
| Last Updated ( Saturday, 19 June 2010 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|